Arkil

Introduction
Arkil Holding A/S is a Danish-based engineering and construction company with headquarters in Haderslev. The company is engaged in various types of construction works, performs asphalt surfacing and maintenance, foundation and marine construction and road service. Besides Denmark, Arkil also operates in Germany, Ireland and Sweden. The company has 1.166 employees and the revenue for 2013 was 2.776,4
million DKK. The foreign part accounted for a total of 29 % of revenues. Arkil’s expectations for 2014 are revenue of 3.000 million DKK. and a profit before taxes between 50-80 million DKK.

Valuation
Our DCF analysis is based on the free cash flow approach which assumes that shareholder wealth is directly related to the free cash flows generated by the company. In order to compute the free cash flow of Arkil the main drivers in the model has been forecasted: net profits, depreciations, CAPEX and net changes in net working capital.

 

In the revenues forecast we start out with revenues for 2014 of 3.000 million DKK equal to Arkil’s own expectations for the year. A future revenue growth of 7,4% in 2015 is assumed based on the 2010-2013
mean. This growth rate is from 2015-2018 set to fade linearly to 2% – our long-run growth rate. The associated costs are forecasted in a similar  manner, however company marginal taxes rates are set to 23,5%
in 2015 and 22% hereafter in accordance with proclaimed tax rules. This provides a net profit forecast asseen in the table below.
To forecast the net changes in net working capital of Arkil we notice from the table below that net working capital the last 3 years approximately has been a fixed percentage of revenues. We therefore set future net working capital equal to this fixed percentage and thereby get forecasted net change in net working capital.
The depreciations are assumed to remain on the 2013 level since there have only been small variations in the item and no obvious trend in the past years. Further, CAPEX is set to fade to this level in order to ensure
balance between the two items in the terminal part.

 

Arkil - table1

To sum up, the forecast for the main drivers is seen below.

Arkil - table2

We use a WACC of 9%, which again is reasonably conservative.

Computing the free cash flows and doing the valuation we get share price of DKK 1.727,58, which compared to the actual share price of 26-05-2014 of DKK 865 equals an up side of 99,7%.

Arkil - table3

Multiple – valuation metrics, P/E, P/B, P/S and EV/EBITDA.
Looking at the valuation multiples for the company, it seems obvious that it is relatively inexpensive company. All multiples are well below both the peer average and peer median.

– Growth and profit margin
In terms of profitability, Arkil is ranked among the top of its close peers, and well above the industry average and median. If we look at the profitability of the company, this is once again a point of relative strength;
however, there is a large variability within the sector. In terms of growth Arkil seems to be lagging behind its peers, with a geometric growth rate of 1.3% during the last five years against a peer average of 1.9%.

– Capitalization and return metric
Compared to peers, the company has a relatively high proportion of equity financing, this is an equity buffer is a desirable property to have in such a cyclical industry. Nevertheless, this capital structure has resulted in a lower ROE compared to peers.

Arkil - table4

 

In conclusion
At a DCF valuation with an up side at 99,7% build up with a conservative estimations and the multiples analysis where Arkil seems relatively inexpensive refer to a expectation that Arkil may be a cheap and solid
investment.
Authors: Allan Gjerløv Jensen, Anders Bager Rasmussen and Christian Montes Schutte

 

 

 

 

 

cBrain

Valuation of cBrain on the Danish market

cBrain is a Danish‐based IT company with headquartered in Copenhagen. They have a market value of 138mio DKK. cBrain creates software solutions for primarily 3 main areas: Member Administration and Services, Project Portfolio Management and Digital Management and Processing. cBrains product are today used in 9 Danish Ministry’s including the Prime Minister’s Office.

Historically, cBrains sales have on average been increasing over the past six years. cBrain pays dividends equal to a yield of 1% (2013) and seen in this light, the growth rates are very impressive and a rare sight in normal IT growth companies. The primary part of cBrain’s business is located in Denmark, but cBrain is doing promotion in Germany. If they are successful in Germany, it can mean increased sales and higher margins because software in general is easy to scale. The value of the expected German business is uncertain, so we have decided to make two
valuations. One of the Danish business alone and one of the possible German.

The Danish market
In our DCF analysis of the Danish part of cBrain, we assume that cBrain can maintain a growth on average of 11% in revenue over the next six years. This may seem high, but we believe that there is still good growth opportunities in Denmark, because cBrains products currently is being used in the ministries, and we believe it will serve as an endorsement for cBrains. We expect that they can maintain their margins and the depreciation and amortization is maintained proportional constant. We believe that this is a conservative estimate because of the scaling possibilities.

cBrain table 1

Based on the table above and a budget‐ and a terminal period, we arrive at the following value for the Danish part of cBrain.

 

cBrain table 2

The German market
In the last few years, cBrain has worked on entering the German market. In may 2012 cBrain made an important cooperation agreement with the large research organization Fraunhofer with the purpose of introducing the F2 system in the German market. cBrain are still spending significant resources to enter the German market. We have valued the German option using a DCF. The revenue and free cash flow estimated is listed below.

cBrain table 3

Notice, in the case cBrain successfully enters the German market, we believe the first revenue is collected in 2015 and is growing significantly until 2020. From the year 2020 we assumes a 2% long term growth rate. With a discount rate of 8%, the net present value of the German business is 460 million DKK, equal to 23 DKK per share in cBrain. The likelihood cBrain successfully enters the German market is very difficult to estimated. For the purpose of this valuation, we set the likelihood of success to 33%. In that case, the likelihood adjusted net present value of ‘the German option’ is 153 million DKK or 7,7 DKK per share.

Conclusion
Overall, we believe that cBrain has a fair value of 14.62 DKK. This provides a potential up side of 85%. This estimate is of course subject to some uncertainty, because of the German part of the business, while the Danish part is pretty certain. So our argument is, that we get the Danish business for a little over fair value and then we get the German part as a option, that can give a big potential up‐side.

 

 

 

 

Brdr. AO

Brdr. A & O Johansen
Brdr. A &O Johansen (AO) distributes and sells plumbing supplies and tools in Denmark (90% of revenue), Sweden and Estonia. In recent years the company has invested heavily in a new efficient warehouse, IT, newAO - table 1 stores and upgrades of existing stores. After weathering the financial crisis with minimal losses, the equity ratio, revenue, profits and book value have been rising steadily since. Today AO is in a strong position with high profits, low debt and a strong platform for future growth.

Strong management team
CEO and major stockowner is Niels A. Johansen, who is 3rd generation of the founder. CFO is Henrik Krabbe who is educated from INSEAD. We believe they make a strong management team with a combination of hands on experience and a strong theoretical background. Sometimes it can cause problems when the CEO is the biggest shareholder, because it
decreases the likelihood the CEO will be fired if he is incompetent, and increases the likelihood the CEO focuses on other goals that creating value for all shareholders. However we are not concerned this is an issue in AO because the chairman of the board is Henning Dyremose, former CEO and chairman of TDC. Dyremose has the experience and clout to be a strong chairman. Overall we are very pleased with the management of AO.

Ownership structure
The founding family controls 52% of the votes through Evoleska Holding AG and thus has full control over the company. Other major shareholders are Sanistål and Lemvigh‐Müller who also both happen to be competitors to AO. AO have not distributed profits to shareholders since the financial crisis and thus have significant financial flexibility today. The flexibility has been build up because AO expects to acquire own stocks from Sanistål who is under financial distress. We expect AO will put their financial flexibility to use in the future, either by acquiring shares from Sanistål or through dividends and share buyback programs.

Valuation
The upside in AO based on a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is 50%, indicating the company is significantly undervalued. When comparing AO to other companies in their industry, AO also appears to be undervalued. AO is trading at almost half the P/E of the second cheapest company, has a P/B comparable to the distressed Sanistål and has the second highest equity ratio.

AO - table 2

Both measured in absolute and relative terms, AO looks significantly undervalued. In addition to the cheap price tag, we find the company to be of high quality in regards to management, financial strength and investments in the future. We have thus decided to invest in AO.

 

Nordfyns Bank

Nordfyns Bank is a Danish local bank located in the Northern part of Funen, holding eight branches in Kerteminde, Odense and Middelfart. The bank is quoted on the NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen stock exchange. The bank – amounting to a market cap of DKK 180 million – is intended primarily for small businesses and private costumers.

The banking sector
The sector has been heavily criticized and unpopular in recent years following the 2008 financial crisis.Among the most prominently discussed causes to the failure of 19 out of 44 quoted Danish banks are that banks seem to have been taking advantage of too kind regulations and excessive risk taking among managing directors. As a consequence banks are now facing harsher regulations exemplified by the increased capital requirements following the 2013‐2019 Basel III roll out and other regulatory initiatives, reducing the risk of future failures. Legislative
requirements are expected to further tighten in coming years, which is expected to affect especially small banks. It can be further noted that the financial crisis in general stressed small banks proportionally more than larger banks. This has resulted in a tendency towards consolidation within the sector. Upon the financial crisis negative vibes has been surrounding the Danish banking sector, leading many investors to avoid the sector. However, the recent 2013 yearly report from Finansiel Stabilitet calms
the people, pointing out “the end of the financial crisis” as Danish banks are now well capitalized. The European Banking Authority takes it the step further and declares Denmark “the neat guy of the class”, when glancing at the robustness of the banking sectors across Europe. Hence, referring to recent reports it seems like the cautiousness among investors is quiet unfounded. However, a few ghosts are still tumbling out of the closets. Latest, Finanstilsynet paid a visit at Sydbank finding a large amount of
rotten loans leading to a DKK 500 million write down. Thus, though the Danish bank sector now seems healthy, it still proves a bit moldy in the corners, suggesting investors to do a thorough quality assessment of bank subjects before any commitment.

Nordfyns bank - Figure 1

Figure 1

Quality assessment
The quality assessment of Nordfyns Bank is partly based on “Tilsynsdiamanten” – a rating system published yearly by Finanstilsynet rating the healthiness of banks along five dimensions – and the generally accepted yearly risk assessment report by Niro Invest. These reports are supplement by thorough examination of the lending portfolio and write down profile of Nordfyns Bank. The risk rating Niro Invest focuses on capital adequacy, industry concentration, depreciation, profitability, business development and earnings. Notably is the large continuous improvement from rank 70 to a solid rank 20 in the period 2008‐2012. This witnesses a capable and responsible management significantly improving the risk profile of Nordfyns Bank relative to other banks.

Looking at “Tilsynsdiamanten”, Nordfyns Bank is only assessed within four dimensions; growth in loans, property exposure, funding ratio and coverage of liquidity. As evident from Table 2, Nordfyns Bank meets all requirements with a significant margin. This indicates that Nordfyns Bank is indeed a healthy bank.

Nordfyns Bank - Table 2

Table 2

The lending portfolio as noted in the Q3 financial report is equally weighted between business and private costumers. No critical remarks have been noted for the private lending portfolio. Turning to the business
lending portfolio its composition is dominated by financing‐ and insurance companies (32.76%). This is a healthy sign since this line of business generally is in good standing. Further, it can be noted that the costumer group of farming, hunting, foresting and angling, which historically has been stressed and given rise to massive write downs, only holds a limited share of the portfolio (9.62%). The development in the lending portfolio since the 2012 annual report has also been positive. The costumer groups of financing and insurance has along with commerce grown significantly, whereas the weight of the more questionable group of farming, hunting, foresting and angling has diminished.

Nordfyns bank - figure 2

Figure 2

The financial crisis cried out for write downs due to worsened expectations to lendings. Nordfyns Bank has seemingly been taking these necessary write downs immediately upon appearance. Figure 3 draws a downward sloping picture as one would expect. This is notable, especially comparing to the development among two comparable banks; Vestfyns Bank and Lollands Bank. That Nordfyns Bank has been able to inflict themselves these massive write downs immediately upon the financial crisis displays that depositors are confident in Nordfyns Bank not fleeing away. Related to this, when winds howled outside management proved once again responsible and competent not hiding “ghosts in the closets” like similar banks show evidence of.

Nordfyns Bank - Figure 3

On the basis of the positive reports from Niro Invest and “Finanstilsynet” supplemented with a healthy lending portfolio and a particularly sensible write down profile it is our belief that Nordfyns Bank’s analytical quality is highly solid and fairly better than most immediate peers.

Valuation
The valuation is based on a multiple comparison since we, referring to the introductory discussion of the banking sector, believe that the market generally is too harsh on a very unpopular sector undervaluing the sector as a whole. Further, most stressed small banks must be assumed failed at this point, and since the market typically has a hard time pricing small cap stocks we believe that small cap banks hold huge potential. The multiple comparison is based only on profitable Danish banks with equity of less than DKK 1.0 billion.

Nordfyns bank - table

Looking at the price to book ratio Nordfyns Bank is located around the average. However, with a price to earnings ratio of 6.03 Nordfyns Bank is in fact by far the cheapest bank based on earnings. Further, it is noted that Nordfyns Bank had the highest ROI in the period Q3 2012 to Q3 2013 and also have performed better than average in the period Q3 2008 to Q3 2013. Lastly, we notice that the bank has had an impressive average growth rate over the last 10 years, however beaten by Vestjydsk Bank.
Based on the multiple comparison we feel confident in pointing out Nordfyns Bank as the best investment subject among Danish banks with equity less than DKK 1.0 billion.

Conclusion
Our quality assessment displays Nordfyns Bank as highly well‐managed and healthy. Management writes off as necessary and the bank is in position of a healthy lending portfolio and secure deposits. We believe that
the sector as a whole is undervalued, and since the multiple comparison reveals Nordfyns Bank as the strongest investment case among small Danish banks Investment Panel Aarhus recommends the stock.